Theatre of the Absurd
Q Right. What is the evidence that the insurgency is in its last throes?
McCLELLAN: I think I just explained to you the desperation of terrorists and their tactics.
Q What's the evidence on the ground that it's being extinguished?
McCLELLAN: Terry, we're making great progress to defeat the terrorist and regime elements. You're seeing Iraqis now playing more of a role in addressing the security threats that they face. They're working side by side with our coalition forces. They're working on their own. There are a lot of special forces in Iraq that are taking the battle to the enemy in Iraq. And so this is a period when they are in a desperate mode.
Q Well, I'm just wondering what the metric is for measuring the defeat of the insurgency.
McCLELLAN: Well, you can go back and look at the Vice President's remarks. I think he talked about it.
Q Yes. Is there any idea how long a 'last throe' lasts for?
McCLELLAN: Go ahead, Steve….
From "Terry Moran vs. Scott McClellan on 'Last Throes' of Insurgency in Iraq", Editor & Publisher, 16 June 2005. They introduced their longer excerpt from the press-briefing transcript this way:
After McClellan outlined the president's plans, leading up to a key June 28th speech, ABC correspondent Terry Moran asked a pointed question, which referred back to an assessment recently made by Vice President Dick Cheney [that the Iraqi insurgency was in its "last throes"].
2 Responses
Subscribe to comments via RSS
Subscribe to comments via RSS
Leave a Reply
To thwart spam, comments by new people are held for moderation; give me a bit of time and your comment will show up.
I welcome comments -- even dissent -- but I will delete without notice irrelevant, rude, psychotic, or incomprehensible comments, particularly those that I deem homophobic, unless they are amusing. The same goes for commercial comments and trackbacks. Sorry, but it's my blog and my decisions are final.
on Monday, 20 June 2005 at 01.30
Permalink
What we have here is a failure to communicate on the White House spokesman's part. What we have on Cheney's part, of course, is a failure to know what the hell he's talking about.
on Monday, 20 June 2005 at 13.15
Permalink
On McClellan's part, certainly a failure to communicate — willfully.
As for Cheney, don't you get the idea that he's very clear on what it is that he's not talking about?