What Would be Free?

Excerpt from "Right of free speech walks a fine line", by David Horsey in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

Jackie Devincent of Seattle sent in a counterargument expressing indignation that some take offense at explicit sex rather than the pervasive violence in entertainment. "Until Americans are willing to question why bloody corpses are sanctified as free speech while nudity and sexuality are condemned as obscene," Devincent says, "we don't even have freedom of thought, let alone freedom of speech."

Posted on February 19, 2005 at 23.38 by jns · Permalink
In: All, Common-Place Book